State Bar Fingerprinting Update

State Bar Fingerprinting Update

CASE is pleased to announce that we have successfully negotiated an agreement with the State in which each department employing Unit 2 members will pay for the new fingerprinting requirement mandated by the State Bar. After the State Bar enacted the regulation requiring new fingerprints for all active attorneys, the State initially changed its Human Resources Manual to specifically exclude payment of the special fee and require all state employed attorneys and judges to pay their own fees. CASE demanded that the State meet and confer over the issue. We ultimately prevailed in convincing the State to cover the cost of the fingerprinting fee for all Unit 2 attorneys and judges where active state bar membership is a condition of employment. CASE argued that the fingerprinting is required to maintain the right to practice law and should be considered a one-time special dues payment rather than a fee that is voluntarily incurred such as the Justice Gap Fund.

For those of you unaware of the details of the fingerprinting requirement, we encourage you to visit the State Bar website for details about your obligations at this link: In summary, all active attorneys licensed in California must be re-fingerprinted so that the Bar can monitor both past and subsequent criminal history information. The deadline for completion is April 30, 2019, but reminder notices will begin going out as early as August 6, 2018. Once all the details for each department are released, CASE encourages all members to complete the fingerprinting as soon as possible to ensure there is no interruption in your ability to practice law.

All attorneys licensed in California will be charged two separate fees. For Unit 2 members, the State has agreed to pay for both fees as follows. The first fee is the print “rolling” fee (aka LiveScan). This can be done by a variety of public and private vendors and there are links on the State Bar webpage that have dozens of vendors in all the major metropolitan areas. You can also search for vendors in your geographic area here: According to the bar, the rolling fees range from as low as $5, to as high as $75, with the average being $33 according to the Bar. The State has agreed to reimburse Unit 2 members up to $35 for this fee, meaning our members will be encouraged to use the lower-cost vendors. The second fee is a flat $49 to pay for background check and ongoing monitoring by DOJ and FBI. The State will fully reimburse for this fee.

Note that procedures will vary among departments. For some departments (perhaps the majority), members will be expected to contact a vendor of their choice and submit for reimbursement of both fees. Other departments may contract with vendors and have them come to the workplace to roll/scan everyone’s prints. While our members at those departments will be encouraged to be at the office on the day or days that the printing occurs, those who cannot be present can still go to their own private vendor and seek reimbursement up to $35. In either case, the State will still pay the $49 fee, although some departments will do so directly and others will reimburse our members. Full details will be forthcoming soon from each department.

Please note that without the strong voice provided by Voting Members and mandatory fee payers, negotiations like this would not be possible. We are constantly striving to increase your wages, improve your working conditions, and protect your pensions so that you can focus on performing your duties and serving the people of California. In the future, without strong membership, CASE may not be able to represent the interests of all members on issues like this. If you are not a Voting Member of CASE, please join today. If you are already a Voting Member, thank you for your support and please encourage your colleagues to join today.

#fingerprinting #StateBar #BarDues

Member Center
CASE Files Newsletter

September 20, 2023 CASE Files
September 13, 2023 CASE Files
September 6, 2023 CASE Files
August 30, 2023 CASE Files
August 23, 2023 CASE Files
August 16, 2023 CASE Files
August 9, 2023 CASE Files
August 2, 2023 CASE Files
July 26, 2023 CASE Files
July 19, 2023 CASE Files
July 12, 2023 CASE Files
July 5, 2023 CASE Files
June 29, 2023 CASE Files
June 21, 2023 CASE Files
June 14, 2023 CASE Files
June 7, 2023 CASE Files
May 31, 2023 CASE Files
May 24, 2023 CASE Files
May 17, 2023 CASE Files
May 10, 2023 CASE Files
May 3, 2023 CASE Files
April 26, 2023 CASE Files
April 19, 2023 CASE Files
April 12, 2023 CASE Files
April 5, 2023 CASE Files
April 3, 2023 CASE Files (Special Edition)
March 29, 2023 CASE Files
March 22, 2023 CASE Files
March 15, 2023 CASE Files
March 8, 2023 CASE Files
March 1, 2023 CASE Files
February 22, 2023 CASE Files
February 15, 2023 CASE Files
February 8, 2023 CASE Files
February 1, 2023 CASE Files
January 25, 2023 CASE Files
January 18, 2023 CASE Files
January 13, 2023 CASE File
January 11, 2022 CASE Files
January 5, 2022 CASE Files
December 28, 2022 CASE Files
December 21, 2022 CASE Files
December 14, 2022 CASE Files
December 7, 2022 CASE Files
November 30, 2022 CASE Files
November 23, 2022 CASE Files
November 16, 2022 CASE Files
November 9, 2022 CASE Files
November 2, 2022 CASE Files
October 26, 2022 CASE Files
October 19, 2022 CASE Files
October 12, 2022 CASE Files
October 5, 2022 CASE Files
September 28, 2022 CASE Files
September 21, 2022 CASE Files
September 14, 2022 CASE Files
September 8, 2023 CASE Files
August 31, 2022 CASE Files
August 17, 2022 CASE Files
August 10, 2022 CASE Files
August 3, 2022 CASE Files
July 27, 2022 CASE Files
July 20, 2022 CASE Files
July 13, 2022 CASE Files
July 6, 2022 CASE Files
June 29, 2022 CASE Files
June 22, 2022 CASE Files
June 15, 2022 CASE Files
June 8, 2022 CASE Files
June 1, 2022 CASE Files
May 25, 2022 CASE Files
May 18, 2022 CASE Files
May 11, 2022 CASE Files
May 4, 2022 CASE Files
April 27, 2022 CASE Files